At the foundation of every Foam Flying Factory aircraft is an XPS foam available at Home Depot or other big box stores called FOAMULAR 1/4 in. x 4 ft. x 50 ft. R-1 Fanfold Rigid Foam Board Insulation Sheathing. DOW Chemical produces a suitable alternative in Blue; however, the green version from LOWES is too brittle and is not a suitable alternative.
The product has a total surface area of 200 ft^2 spread across 20 folded panels that are roughly 48" (tall) by 30" (wide) by 0.25" (thick) each. In general about 1" of each panel fold is unusable except for specific circumstances and situations.
The manufacture reports the weight for all 200 ft^2 is 11# or 0.05500 #/ft^2 which equates to 0.02685 g/cm^2. The density equates to 0.042289 g/cm^3.
Given $45.00 for 200 ft^2, the average cost is 0.00024 $/cm^2. and may be of sufficient quantity to produce 10 aircraft at $4.50 per aircraft in XPS material costs. Actual aircraft count will depend greatly on level of detail (LOD) and waste.
XPS from has two layers, an external plastic skin which is pealed off and the XPS core.
XPS has a grain that you can use to your advantage in bending and structure.
You will hear a lot about Depron in the production of remote control aircraft, but availability in the United States is lacking for a number of reasons, primary due to the product not meeting building code for fire resistance. The product comes in two colors, White and Gray with their weights being between 81% to 71% lighter than FFF respectively. Some alternatives are on the market as such as Dollar Tree Foam or Flite Test Foam by Adams or in limited quantities / conditions Model Plane Foam. Foam Flying Factory has produced aircraft out of all the above types of foam and only FFF is readily available, strong, and flexible.
It Depends. A high level of detail (LOD) aircraft will weigh more than a low LOD aircraft, all other things being equal. This is because the high LOD will use more foam, more glue, and possibly more servos, etc. all requiring different motor sizes which also results in higher or lower total model weight.
Each functional aircraft needs to exist in a magical zone where LOD, weight, and motor are all in balance.
SU-47 which has a lower LOD with a wingspan of 80cm, a length of 108.6 cm, and a height of 25.4 cm. An effective volume of 2,860 cm^3 (density: 121 g/cm^3 or 4,676 cm^2) with effective dry weight of 269 g.
F-35 which has a higher LOD of similar size is 831 g dry weight. Add on battery, motor, servos, receiver, cables, etc and the total wet weight could be 602 g (SU-47) or 1134 g (F-35).
In all cases we want motor(s) that produces a total ground static thrust equal to the wet weight otherwise flying operations will be insufficient.
In aviation the force that counteracts weight is lift, and lift requires either raw motor power through the propeller airfoil (drone), or through the airfoil of the aircrafts wing (sailplane).
In reality, aircraft will use a combination of both to achieve flight. Development of a wings airfoil is critical to how the model will fly and what flight characteristics the model will exhibit.
Nearly all Foam Flying Factory aircraft use some variation of the Kline–Fogleman airfoil.
Adding a KF airfoil increases the wings weight lifting capabilities, but comes with additional weight.
For example; a 5" wingcord may have three layers, whereas a 9" wingcord may have five layers.